AML Training & Awareness Assessment

Evaluate your AML training program

16 questions • 12-14 min

This assessment evaluates the effectiveness of your AML training and awareness program, including content quality, delivery methods, role-specific training, and ongoing improvement processes. It provides insights into your current maturity level and identifies key areas for enhancement.

Instructions

Answer all questions honestly based on your organisation's current practices
Select the option that most closely matches your situation
Complete all sections to receive a comprehensive evaluation
Your answers are confidential and not stored on our servers

About This Self-Assessment

This tool helps institutions evaluate their AML training program based on common regulatory expectations and industry best practices (e.g., FATF, training effectiveness standards). It covers key areas like program content and design, training delivery and engagement, role-specific training, and effectiveness measurement.

Disclaimer: This is a self-assessment tool for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Your responses are processed locally in your browser and are not stored or transmitted. For a comprehensive review, consult with compliance experts or request a personalised demo of iTrack.

Section 1 of 4•Program Content & Design

0% Complete

Assessment Sections

Program Content & Design

This section evaluates the comprehensiveness and quality of your AML training curriculum and materials.

How comprehensive is the content of your AML training program?

Comprehensive coverage of all relevant AML topics with detailed examples

Extensive curriculum covering regulations, typologies, red flags, internal procedures, case studies, and emerging risks

Adequate coverage of essential AML topics

Good coverage of key areas including regulations, suspicious activity identification, and internal procedures

Basic coverage with limited depth

Fundamental topics covered but lacking detailed examples or comprehensive scope

Minimal coverage with significant gaps

Limited curriculum that fails to address important topics or lacks substantive content

How often is your AML training content updated to reflect regulatory changes and emerging risks?

Proactive updates with systematic review process

Regular scheduled reviews plus immediate updates for significant changes, with dedicated resources for monitoring developments

Regular updates with defined review cycles

Annual or semi-annual review process with structured approach to incorporating changes

Occasional updates without systematic process

Updates occur but without regular schedule or comprehensive approach

Infrequent or reactive updates

Content remains largely static with updates only after regulatory scrutiny or problems arise

How does your organisation incorporate real-world examples and case studies in AML training?

Consider both internal experiences and external/industry examples.

Extensive use of relevant examples with detailed analysis

Rich mix of sanitised internal cases and industry examples with in-depth discussion of detection, investigation, and lessons learned

Good use of examples with adequate context

Regular incorporation of case studies with sufficient context to illustrate key concepts

Limited use of examples with minimal context

Some examples used but with insufficient depth or relevance to job functions

Minimal or no use of practical examples

Training largely theoretical without practical applications or relevant cases

How well does your training content explain the rationale behind AML requirements?

Comprehensive explanation of purpose and importance

Detailed coverage of the "why" behind requirements, including consequences of non-compliance and broader financial crime context

Good explanation with clear rationale

Clear communication of purpose behind key requirements and procedures

Basic explanation with limited context

Some explanation of rationale but primarily focused on the "what" rather than the "why"

Minimal explanation of purpose or context

Training focused almost exclusively on processes without explaining underlying purpose

Section 1 of 4